잘못된 판매자 카테고리 코드를 사용하는 Curaçao 라이선스가 있는 도박 웹사이트에 대한 질문 (832 페이지)

Because you clearly didnt read posts from today about it and have quoted a post where I alluded to the fact that people shouldn't be scared of telling a genuine bank that the transactions were an illegal gambling site. I understand how it works - I know previous posters who are no longer on the thread and they advised me completely in my case. Gambling was NOT mentioned because it was Revolut - this was clear. However, Revolut then decided that 3 of the payments were "Money transfers" and this is a curveball for merchants- this is covered in Mastercard rules as well.

Mate this is draining. If want to share info over email let me know.

Cheers mate - all my Mastercards ones are raised under goods just waiting on no response now.

VISA under 12.7 again waiting 30 days to withdraw.

Probably all good now as I am determined this won’t happen again, but happy to share my VISA stuff if you need it via email.

Hello

Anyone have an email for

Noxsus and Blgwzr

Thanks in advance!

Hej

Någon som har mejl till

Noxsus och Blgwzr

Tack på förhand!

Blogwizzaro are linked to gainkit and Terraverse. See previous posts from me I think this is point a few are raising.

I have literally given you a step by step guide on that previous message.

Do you honestly think you are some kind of chargeback Jesus ;D ;D You have spent the last 5 months arguing with everyone here and you are now defending Revolut... REVOLUT ;D Strange little man you are.

thanks for that!

i was asking for Noxsus and Blgwzr

They are not mate - they are Mastercard card payments made to a casino with the names of Quickbit as the merchant. They are not bank transfers- money transfers and bank transfers are not the same.

Ok I can't be bothered to argue but good luck anyway.

BLGWZR are Blogwizzaro

Read it though - 6051 is the new MCC they like to use to hide things because under Mastercard rules these are not normally available for chargeback. It had to be argued with the help of lawyers and the FSPO - only way Revolut would pay me back. I'd be shocked if people in the UK havent encountered this.

Ah this makes more sense. Bitsent is obviously quickbit. Everyone struggled with quickbit. They put through as cryptocurrency therefore class the service as already provided.

Noxsus = [email protected]

Yes! This was the start of the Revolut lies though - Quickbit's bank are Revolut!! LOL! Huge conflict of interest.

Quickbit and their sub companies have never ever sent me one response or acknowledgement - ironically this is what won me the cases eventually, their ignorance and nothing confirmed anywhere.

But ultimately this was the only one that weren't successful for me on Revolut. Infact it was goriwire but still same company quickbit. I blamed myself for raising it wrong. Plus it's gone past the 120 days now.

Thanks! Do you know their website?

But coinshop Fomiline uab was successful for me. Again this is quickbit also.