고정 또는 비 점착 보너스?

I have been playing at online casinos for years and I have tried both sticky and non sticky bonuses. My personal liking will go to non sticky bonuses just because I get to withdraw all of my winnings when I win, compared to sticky ones. Although, I do know that the wagering requirements sometimes might not be in favor of players, so it is quite rare that you can win or that you need to spend a lot to win. But I think that sticky bonuses are too complicated. What about you? Which would do you all prefer?

I'd personally choose none of these two options. As you say sticky ones are complicated and non-sticky includes wagering req. Regarding bonuses, have you ever used a feature "buy bonus" during any game? It's costly and feels somehow stupid to me.

I think it doesn't really matter. Bonuses give you a free chance of winning, but it also involves a lot of requirements. If I made a deposit, I'd never take a bonus with it, because it could potentially cause me troubles later (casinos have very different rules, but for example you could win while playing with your own money, but your winnings would be limited, because you took a bonus etc.)

In case of no deposit bonuses, I wouldn't waste time on playing bonuses with too high wagering requirement or extremely low maximum withdrawal. But let's say if you get a free bonus where you can withdraw 100 dollars and you need to wager it 30x, then you can give it a try.