홈 화면 온라인 카지노 Unibet Casino 리뷰

Unibet Casino 리뷰

한국의 플레이어에 대한 평가: 9.1
9.7 명성
평가
완벽한
평판
한국의 플레이어에 대한 평가: 9.1
완벽한
평판
저자: Matej Novota | 이 리뷰는 이 때 마지막으로 업데이트 되었음: 2020-02-18T00:00Z  

Unibet Casino을(를) 철저히 검토한 결과 완벽한 평판 등급을 주었으며, 이는 카지노가 얻을 수 있는 최고의 등급입니다. 검토하면서 우리는 카지노 플레이어들의 컴플레인, 예상 수입, 라이센스, 게임 진위성, 고객 지원 품질, 이용 약관의 공정성, 철회 및 승수 한도 및 기타 요인을 고려했습니다. Unibet Casino은(는) 아래에 나열된 다른 온라인 카지노와 관련하여 등급에 영향을 받습니다. 아래의 전체 리뷰를 읽고 이 카지노에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

조사 및 추정에 따르면 Unibet Casino은(는) 엄청난 수익과 플레이어 수를 가진 가장 큰 온라인 카지노 중 하나입니다. 더 큰 규모의 카지노에서는 크게 딸 경우 문제가 없어야 하고, 규모가 작은 카지노는 크게 땄을 때 어려움을 겪을 수 있으므로 카지노의 수입은 중요한 요소입니다.

현재 데이터베이스에 이 카지노에 대한 11개의 컴플레인이 있으며, 이 카지노와 관련이 있는 카지노에 대한 24개의 컴플레인이 발견되었습니다. 이러한 컴플레인으로 인해 해당 카지노에 총 3,638 블랙 포인트가 부여되었으며 그 중 1,754은 관련 카지노에서 나왔습니다. 아래에서 모든 컴플레인 및 블랙 포인트에 대한 자세한 정보를 찾을 수 있습니다.

이 리뷰에 언급된 모든 정보와 이 카지노의 완벽한 평판 등급을 바탕으로 우리는 Unibet Casino이(가) 플레이 하기 좋은 곳이라는 결론을 내렸습니다. 완벽한 온라인 카지노를 찾고 있다면 이 사이트를 시도해보세요.

더 읽어보기 줄이기

한국의 주민
수용함

버지니아로부터의 IP 주소
차단되지 않음
VPN
사용
금지
웹사이트
언어
영어 (+16)
라이브 채팅
언어
영어 (+17)
이메일 지원
언어
영어 (+17)
무보증 보너스
사용 불가
보증금 보너스*T&C 적용
€100까지 100%
소유자
Kindred group
설립
1997
인출 한도
EUR에 제한이 없습니다
라이센스 기관들
몰타
완벽한
지브롤터
우수한
영국
완벽한
흥미로운 사실
  • 스칸디나비아와 유럽에서 온 대부분의 선수
긍정적
  • 다양한 라이브 딜러 게임
  • 좋은 게임 선택
  • 1997 년 이후 온라인에서 가장 큰 온라인 도박 사업자 중 하나
  • 무제한 인출
  • 우수한 평판과 많은 eGaming 상
  • iOS 및 Android 용 모바일 카지노 애플리케이션
부정적
  • 직불 카드로 입금 한 경우 3 % 수수료

Unibet Casino 및 관련 카지노에 대한 컴플레인 (35)

웹에서 광범위한 조사를 실시한 결과 Unibet Casino 또는 이 카지노와 관련된 모든 브랜드에 대한 35개의 컴플레인을 확인했습니다. 이러한 컴플레인의 심각성과 신뢰성 및 예상 카지노 수익의 크기를 고려하여 Unibet Casino에게 완벽한 평판을 주었습니다.

완벽한 카지노 평판
자동 번역
Unibet Casino에 대한 직접적 컴플레인
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 1117
The player was asked to send documents for verification over and over again while his case remains unresolved.
Hans, a player from Germany, played in the casino 24hbet where he had €15,000 left. All the 24hbet casino's players accounts were transferred to Unibet casino. The player created a new account with Unibet and provided all the documents needed for verification. With adding some additional documents, they were all approved. After that, Hans asked the casino via email if he could receive the remaining balance from 24hbet casino. The casino responded stating that they need his ID and utility documents again, even though those were approved just recently. When Hans asked the casino for an update, he kept receiving the same answer, to send the documents for verification again. Hans became very frustrated and this case remains open.
분쟁 금액 : €15,000 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 5/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 224
플레이어의 상금이 취소되었습니다.
Player said that he had asked the live chat about the reason why only part of his withdrawal request was approved and the other part was pending. He was told that his account needs to be verified further and they needed to call him too. The casino called him and asked him some questions for verifications, however, the player said he had failed to answer correctly one question and his account got blocked. Then his pending withdrawal was canceled and his deposit was returned to him. The casino replied by saying that the player had breached the terms and conditions but he denied these accusations saying he won fairly and that the casino had been seeking for reasons why not to pay him his winnings. No more reaction from the casino, no more update since then.
분쟁 금액 : €8,686 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 10/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 72
The player's bonus funds were confiscated and his account was closed due to a failed document verification.
Joe, a player from the UK, made a deposit of £100 and took a bonus. He met all the wagering requirements and requested a withdrawal of £2,119. When he couldn't complete the withdrawal, he contacted a live chat representative and found out that the casino did some internal security checks and needed him to send identification documents for verification. The player provided the documents to the casino, but they were denied due to his documents failed their verification process. His bonus funds were confiscated and the account was closed as per their terms and conditions. This case remains opened.
분쟁 금액 : £2,119 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 7/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 51
The casino closed the player's account due to the terms and conditions being breached.
After the casino's longtime player made his first deposit, he asked the casino to close all of his duplicate accounts and leave him with only one. That one account was successfully verified and had a leftover balance of €400. But when the player tried to log in, he wasn't able to do so. The casino informed him that the account was blocked due to fraudulent card activity that was reported to them by the player's bank. The player decided to complain to MGA (Malta Gaming Authority). This case remains open since the casino never provided the player with any relevant proof about broken terms and conditions rules.
분쟁 금액 : €400 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 4/2016
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 32
The player's account was closed without any relevant reason given.
Nikolay, a player of Bulgarian nationality, but a citizen of Holland, opened an account. He made a deposit, took and used a bonus, completed the wagering requirements, and requested a withdrawal of €770. He was asked by the casino to send documents for verification which lead to his account closure. The player thought that they closed his account due to being a Bulgarian nationality, but the casino told him that was not the reason. They told him that he knows exactly why they rejected him as a player. The player claimed that he had no clue why his documents were not accepted. The Askgamblers representative asked the casino to provide a valid proof about the player breaking the terms and conditions. They never responded.
분쟁 금액 : €770 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 31
The player's account didn't pass the document verification on multiple tries.
A player from Germany with a Spanish ID made a deposit of £80 and was asked to provide documents for verification. Unfortunately, the casino repeatedly didn't accept those documents, even though some of them were posted as a legitimate proof at the casino's website. The customer support couldn't explain to the player why his documents weren't accepted and he had lost his £80. There is no update on this case.
분쟁 금액 : £80 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 5/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 7
The player didn't pass the document verification and his account was closed.
The player registered at the casino and a few weeks later, he was asked by the casino to provide documents for verification. He sent those documents and they were successfully verified, but his account was blocked later on anyways. The casino claimed that the documents sent for verification did not pass their verification. The player was ready to provide the documents for verification again, but the casino never responded to the request. There is no update on this case.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
총 417 블랙 포인트로 6개의 유사한 컴플레인
반응 정책 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 287
Player's account was closed, their winnings were confiscated, and the deposit was returned to them due to the casino's decision.
After the player requested a withdrawal, the casino asked them to provide different documents for verification, which they did. Later on, their account was closed, their winnings were confiscated and their deposit was returned to them. The casino claimed that according to their terms and conditions, they were allowed to do so any time they decided to. The complaint was left without any response from the casino and it remains unsolved.
분쟁 금액 : £2,550 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 1/2019
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
결제 지연, 상태를 알 수 없음
블랙 포인트: 39
Extremely long payment and verification process without a resolution.
The player complained that the processing of his withdrawal request was taking way too long. ThePogg representative tried to help him and received an information from the casino that the ID that was submitted for verification wasn't genuine to them. On the other hand, the casino failed to provide any details regarding the specific issues with the ID. The complaint remains unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 10/2015
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
결제 지연, 상태를 알 수 없음
블랙 포인트: 19
Over extremely long withdrawal process of such small amounts.
The player made three deposits of $85, $90, and $20. He tried to withdraw some of his winnings but first, he needed to send some documents for verification. He sent those requested documents to the casino, but they wouldn't accept them. The casino was supposed to contact the player about an update via email and they did, one year later!!! They asked him to provide the same documents for verification again. During that year, the player closed his Entropay account and lost any hope to ever receive his winnings that he won so fairly. In the complaint, he also mentioned that he would like the casino to refund him on at least one of his deposits through a Neteller account. There is no update on this complaint.
분쟁 금액 : $195 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 5/2014
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
총 19 블랙 포인트로 1개의 유사한 컴플레인
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 5
매우 긴 기술적 문제 조사.
라이브 카지노에서 게임을 한 후 플레이어는 자신의 상을 인정받지 못했습니다. 고객 서비스에 연락하라는 경고 메시지가 나타났습니다. 그들은 기술 부서가 무슨 일이 있었는지 조사 할 것이라고 말했지만, 업데이트를 요청하는 4 개의 이메일을 카지노에 보낸 후에는 그에게 응답하지 않았습니다. 또한 불만에 답변 한 적이 없으며 여전히 해결되지 않은 상태로 남아 있습니다.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2014
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
관련 Casinohuone에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
카지노로부터의 불충분한 증거
블랙 포인트: 353 (이 카지노의 경우 35)
The casino claimed they were unable to identify the player as a real person.
After a successful withdrawal of €1,700, the player requested another one in the amount of €1,300. The player continued on playing and all of a sudden got an error and when they tried to log back into the account, it was locked for the next 24-hours and needed to contact the casino's support. The casino asked them to send in all kinds of documents for verification and they did so straight away. After that, the casino claimed that they were unable to identify the player as a real person and once they would be done with a KYC process, they would pay the player their winning. They never gave an update to the complaint and it remained unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : €1,300 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 4/2015
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
관련 Bingo.com Casino에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
자체 배제 실패
블랙 포인트: 778 (이 카지노의 경우 77)
Player tried to receive their deposit funds back to the self-exclusion at the casino's sister site.
The player opened an account and soon after that, they found out that the casino belonged to the same casino group from which they had self-excluded themself before. They then contacted the casino and asked for a refund of their deposit but they didn't react to their request nor the complaint itself. There's no other information available ever since.
분쟁 금액 : £1,200 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 12/2019
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
카지노로부터의 불충분한 증거
블랙 포인트: 250 (이 카지노의 경우 25)
The player was accused by the casino to had abused the system and confiscated all of his funds.
The player played at the casino and used a refer-a-friend bonus to gain NOK1,500 in addition to his NOK100 initial deposit but the casino blocked his account and accused him of abusing the system and confiscated all of his money. The player admitted there might've been some activity seen as suspicious with his friend he had referred, but he wanted his NOK100deposit back. The casino only provided a vague statement with terms they claim the player breached and won't comment any further.
분쟁 금액 : kr100 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 10/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 176 (이 카지노의 경우 17)
The player was accused of having opened two accounts but the casino allowed him to continue playing.
The player used a bonus and won NOK58,000. However, he was denied his withdrawal and accused with opening two accounts. He got his deposit back plus €,1000 which looked very strange. However, the player continued to play and won again, and this time, he was allowed to withdraw the entire amount of €3,500 without any problems. Causes some doubts in the casino's system, but they still owe the player €5,800. There is no update on this case and it remains unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : kr58,000 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 60 (이 카지노의 경우 6)
Player wasn't able to provide documents for verification.
The player couldn't pass the account verification because they were unable to provide utility bills since they were renting not owning a place. The casino refused to respond to the complaint and it remains unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 12/2019
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 0
설명없이 플레이어의 계정이 폐쇄되었습니다.
After winning a couple of hundred euros, the player was asked to provide documents for verification, which they did right away. Unfortunately, later on, their account was closed and their winnings were confiscated without an explanation. The player wasn't aware of breaking any rules or terms. The casino became unresponsive and the complaint remained unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 7/2013
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
관련 Maria Casino에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
카지노로부터의 불충분한 증거
블랙 포인트: 200 (이 카지노의 경우 20)
Bonus abuse accusation, deposit returned.
Player complained that upon his registration he had to pass through the verification checks first, then he made a deposit and used a bonus. He won some money and asked for a withdrawal. He was asked for further verification documents which he provided but later his account was suspended and he was accused of a bonus abuse. Casino proposed to return his deposit. Player refused any bonus abuse accusations. Proofs couldn't be shown. No more update since then.
분쟁 금액 : £500 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 5/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 24 (이 카지노의 경우 2)
관련이없는 상황으로 인해 플레이어의 계정이 폐쇄되었습니다.
The player complained that she had passed through all the verifications checks upon sign up. She then received an email from the casino informing her about new rules with which she didn't agree and asked for her account to be closed. However, she was unable to withdraw the remaining funds because the casino required more documents for verification and they replied that the player had already received an explanation this situation by email and asked the player to provide additional documents for verification. The casino tried to reach her via phone but she said she usually didn't answer to unknown numbers. No more update since then.
분쟁 금액 : kr200 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 4/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
관련 32Red Casino에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
카지노로부터의 불충분한 증거
블랙 포인트: 8462 (이 카지노의 경우 846)
The player wasn't able to provide sufficient enough documents for verification and his account remained closed and his deposit was returned to him.
The player didn't have a problem with his previous withdrawal and requested another one for the amount of €12,000. He was asked by the casino to provide the information where did the funds that he played with came from. He provided this document where it stated that his daughter provided the funds for him. About ten days later he received an answer from the casino that said the document was not sufficient enough and the account would remain closed and his deposit in the amount of €6,000 would be returned to him. The player decided to take the legal steps to have this matter resolved. The case remains unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : €12,000 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 5358 (이 카지노의 경우 535)
Player's withdrawal request of £50,000 was delayed.
The player requested a withdrawal of £50,000 and was asked to provide all kinds of documents for the account verification. He sent everything in and waited for the casino to respond. After that, the player contacted the customer service on a few occasions and was told that the security team was checking his documents and they were not sure how long it was going to take them. There is no further information available and the complaint remains unsolved.
분쟁 금액 : £50,000 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 4/2019
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 365 (이 카지노의 경우 36)
플레이어가 확인에 실패했고 계정이 폐쇄되었습니다.
The player requested a withdrawal and sent all the documents for verification, but they were insufficient and the casino confiscated their winnings and also decided to close their account. The casino refused to communicate with the player, didn't react to this complaint and ever since then, it remains unsolved.
분쟁 금액 : £1,000 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 2/2019
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
카지노로부터의 불충분한 증거
블랙 포인트: 283 (이 카지노의 경우 28)
The player was accused of duplicate accounts, abused bonuses, and due to that, all the funds were seized.
The player followed all the terms and conditions while she had won £5,000 with her £10 free cash bonus. After she had sent all the documents for verification, the casino accused her of double accounts and abused bonuses. She insisted that there was a mistake due to the fact that she had only recently moved to a new apartment and perhaps this was the cause of misunderstanding. The casino didn't want to accept the woman's words and refused to pay her the winning. The case remains unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : £5,000 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 11/2014
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
기술적 결함
블랙 포인트: 80 (이 카지노의 경우 8)
The player's winnings were not accredited to them due to the technical difficulties while playing on the casino's mobile app.
The player had an issue while he played a game on his casino's mobile app and the winnings were not credited to their account. The player tried to resolve this issue with a support team and also wrote them an email but nothing changed. Casino advised the player to not to play this game until the technical problem would be resolved. There is no further information on this case.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 10/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 60 (이 카지노의 경우 6)
Player cannot request a withdrawal.
The player is not able to withdraw his money for more than 2 weeks. We closed the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.
분쟁 금액 : €100 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 12/2019
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 27 (이 카지노의 경우 2)
연결 계정 비난으로 플레이어의 상금이 압수되었습니다.
32Red 카지노에서 새 계정을 개설 한 후 플레이어는 £ 10 상당의 무료 스핀을 받았습니다. 그들은 베팅 요건을 완료하고 상금을 철회하도록 요청했습니다. 그러나 카지노는 모든 자금을 압수했으며 플레이어가 연결된 계정을 가지고 있다고 비난했습니다. 플레이어는 이전에 계정이 없었습니다. 카지노는 중재자를 통해서나 플레이어와 직접적으로이 사건을 다루기를 꺼려했습니다.
분쟁 금액 : £400 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 7/2019
계속 더 읽기 : thepogg.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 7 (이 카지노의 경우 1)
Failed self-exclusion.
The player admitted to the chat representative that he had a gambling problem and asked to be self-excluded. The chat representative advised the player to send an email since he couldn't do so through a live chat. He wrote the email but still was able to gamble further €25,000. He begged the casino to have his deposits returned to him because of his gambling addiction. The player contacted the UKGC. There is no further information on the case.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 7/2017
계속 더 읽기 : casinomeister.com
더 읽기
관련 Roxy Palace Casino에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 0
Player's account canceled, all funds confiscated. The casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions.
After winning some amount of money, the player's account was canceled and all their funds were confiscated. This left the player frustrated but the casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions. No update since then.
분쟁 금액 : €1,800 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 2/2013
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
불확실한 경우, 좋은 규제기관
블랙 포인트: 0
Player allegedly received a bonus they did not ask for.
According to the player they received a bonus they had never asked for and tried to cancel it. The casino informed the player since they had already started to wager, they had to finish the wagering requirements. The player would have rather withdrawn their deposit. The complaint remained unresolved. No update since then.
분쟁 금액 : £150 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 2/2013
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
과거의 죄
블랙 포인트: 0
Player’s account was locked. The casino claimed it was due to a duplicate account terms and conditions breach and an abusive behavior of the player.
The player complained their account was locked and all their funds were seized. The casino claimed it was due to a duplicate account terms and conditions breach and an abusive behavior of the player. According to the casino, the player had been already registered in a sister casino using a different identity. After the casino locked the player's account, they behaved abusively which the player admits. No update since then.
분쟁 금액 : ?? (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 9/2010
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
관련 iGame Casino에 대한 컴플레인 (동일한 소유자)
규제 기관: 플레이어가 옳았다
블랙 포인트: 724 (이 카지노의 경우 72)
The player was unable to retrieve his money via debit MasterCard payment method.
Martin requested a withdrawal of €800 but wasn't able to retrieve the payment via his debit MasterCard so the money was sent back to the sender, the casino. After that, he suggested the casino to send the payment to him via his Neteller account or wire transfer. The casino was unable to track the payment and also stopped responding to Martin's emails. Martin contacted the MGA for help but there is no update available ever since then and the case remained unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : €800 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 6/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
지연된 지불, 아마 지불 되었음
블랙 포인트: 100 (이 카지노의 경우 10)
Player's withdrawal request was delayed due to the payment provider complications.
The player requested a withdrawal of €36,58 via his bank transfer but the bank itself was experiencing technical difficulties and didn't accept the payment. The player then decided to withdraw the money via his Skrill account. But this time, it was the casino who caused the delay by haven't verified their Skrill account yet. There is no further information available.
분쟁 금액 : €36.58 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 1/2020
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
지연된 지불, 아마 지불 되었음
블랙 포인트: 100 (이 카지노의 경우 10)
Very log verification and withdrawal process for no reason.
Jarda made a withdrawal request of €500 and sent all the documents needed for verification. His ID was accepted right away, but his bank statement wasn't. He contacted the support and they told him he should wait 1-3 days for them to process. Ten days later, his documents were still under the investigation. Without any further information available, the case remained unresolved.
분쟁 금액 : €500 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 12/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 63 (이 카지노의 경우 6)
Player's deposit wasn't credited to his player's account.
The player deposited €100 but the money never arrived at his player's account. He was able to provide proof with his bank account statements but the casino never responded to him. The complaint remains unsolved.
분쟁 금액 : €100 (실제 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 11/2018
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
반응 없음, 우수한 규제 기관
블랙 포인트: 36 (이 카지노의 경우 3)
플레이어는 매우 긴 문서 검증 및 인출 처리를 경험했습니다.
플레이어는 알 수없는 금액의 출금을 요청하고, 완전한 확인에 필요한 모든 서류와 함께 그의 얼굴과 여권 정보가 명확하게 보이는 여권을 손에 들고있는 사람의 사진을 보냈습니다. 카지노는 플레이어가 문서를 받았는지 또는 확인에 성공했는지에 대해 플레이어를 업데이트하지 않았습니다. 사용 가능한 추가 정보가 없으며 사례가 해결되지 않은 상태로 남아 있습니다.
분쟁 금액 : $100 (보너스 돈)
이 컴플레인은 다음을 출처로 함: 3/2017
계속 더 읽기 : askgamblers.com
더 읽기
컴플레인 더 표시 (+21)

이 카지노에 대해서 제출할 컴플레인이 있거나 개인적으로 나쁜 경험을 한 적이 있습니까? 컴플레인을 작성하여 다른 플레이어들에게도 도움이 되어주세요.

* 우리는 정책을 어기고 있는 카지노들에 대한 컴플레인을 목록으로 작성할 뿐입니다, 공정한 갬블링 코덱스.

Unibet Casino 보너스

9.7
/10
완벽한 카지노 평판 평판

1번째 보증금 보너스 - Unibet Casino

한국에서 이용 가능
  • 최소 보증금: €10
  • 베팅 요구 사항: 25x 보너스
  • 이 보너스는 거의 즉시 받을 수 있습니다
  • 신규 플레이어 만
  • 18+, rgf.org.mt (책임있는 게임 재단)
  • 라이브 게임에는 35 배의 보너스 금액 베팅 요건이 있습니다
  • 전체 조건이 적용됩니다
  • 보너스는 옵트 인 30 일 후에 만료됩니다
  • Paysafecard, Skrill 및 Neteller는 제외
 
  • 게임 이용이 가능한 국가들은 다음과 같습니다:
보너스 받기
VPN이 허용되지 않습니다

Unibet Casino 결제 수단

결제 방법 보증금
한도 및 수수료
인출
한도 및 수수료
인출 시간
Skrill Skrill $20 - $15,000
$15 - $13,000
-
Neteller Neteller $20 - $15,000
$15 - $15,000
-
PaySafeCard PaySafeCard $10 - $1,000
수수료: 3.0%
이용 불가 -
ecoPayz ecoPayz $20 - $15,000
$15 - $13,000
-
Mastercard Mastercard $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
VISA VISA $10 - $50,000
수수료: 2.5%
$15 - $50,000
1 - 3
Trustly Trustly €5 - €6,000
$10 - $100,000
-
Solo Solo $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
WebMoney WebMoney $20 - $250
이용 불가 -
PayPal PayPal -
-
-
VISA Electron VISA Electron $10 - $50,000
수수료: 2.5%
$15 - $50,000
1 - 3
Switch Switch $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
Maestro Maestro $10 - $50,000
이용 불가 -
Bank transfer Bank transfer 이용 불가 $25 - ?
-
Instant Banking Instant Banking $5 - $10,000
이용 불가 -
Earthport Earthport - - -
PayNearMe PayNearMe -
이용 불가 -

Unibet Casino 게임

슬롯
룰렛
블랙잭
스포츠 베팅
비디오 포커
빙고
바카라
잭팟 게임들
라이브 게임
포커
크랩
키노
스크래치 카드
e스포츠-베팅
최고의 10 신뢰할 수있는 카지노
null
Melbet Casino
8.2
null
Casinoin
8.5
null
5plusbet Casino
8.0
null
Nitro Casino
8.6
null
Megapari Casino
7.8
null
Unikrn Casino
7.7
null
Pinnacle Casino
10
null
Empire777 Casino
9.2
null
TrustDice Casino
7.6
null
BC.Game Casino
8.4
Unibet Casino
9.7/10
완벽한 평판
Unibet Casino
9.7/10
완벽한 평판
이 카지노 방문하기