William Hill Casino 리뷰

플레이어는 William Hill Casino의 계정이 정지되었으며 상당한 금액의 돈이 거기에 갇혀 있다고 주장했습니다. 이전에는 확인을 위해 문서를 보내달라는 요청을 받았지만 며칠 후 카지노는 플레이어에게 필요한 서류를 받지 못했다고 알렸습니다. 플레이어는 반복적으로 문서를 보냈고 그 동안 스포츠 베팅에서 최대 22,000 CAD를 획득했습니다. 안타깝게도 해당 플레이어의 계정은 아직 검토 중이었고 일주일이 지나도 아무런 진전이 없었습니다. 카지노는 불만 사항에 전혀 반응하지 않았기 때문에 해결되지 않은 것으로 간주되어 폐쇄되었습니다.

플레이어는 도박 중독이 있다고 주장했으며, 이로 인해 2017년에 다른 온라인 카지노인 RedBet에서 자체 출입을 금지해야 했으며 나중에 폐쇄되어 William Hill Casino의 일부가 되었습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 플레이어는 William Hill에도 등록하여 3,000 EUR 이상을 자신의 계좌에 입금했습니다. 플레이어에 따르면, 그들은 도박 중독자로 카지노에 등록할 수 없어야 했고 나중에 William Hill이 된 카지노에서 자신을 제외시켰습니다. 카지노 담당자가 이에 반응하지 않았기 때문에 불만 사항은 해결되지 않았습니다.

플레이어 "Anna Krepko"는 William Hill Casino에 € 2300를 입금했습니다. 나중에 그녀는 알 수없는 금액의 인출을 요청했습니다. 카지노는 여러 차례 확인 문서를 요청한 후 지불 인에게 "게임에 대한 서면 설명"을 제공하도록 요청 받았습니다. 인출은 여전히 보류 중이었고 플레이어는 기다리도록 요청 받았습니다. 그 이후로 더 이상 업데이트가 없습니다.

A player from Belarus had his account blocked without any explanation. He then contacted the support for an explanation and was asked to provide documents and photos of him for his account verification. When he sent those about ten times within one year, he would receive the same answer from the casino that they were still verifying them. The only thing that the player wanted was for the casino to reopen his account. Ever since then, there's no further information available.

Sophie decided to reopen her account and once she requested a withdrawal after she won, her account got blocked. When she contacted the casino for an explanation, they asked her to wait few more days. Eleven days after that, her account was still blocked. No other details are available and the complaint remains unsolved.

The player had three pending withdrawals totaling of £470 via Quick Cash Voucher. The casino told the player that the whole processing would take from 24-48hours but five days later, no money was received. The player did provide the casino with all the documents that were needed for their account verification so that wasn't the hold-up. There is no further information available ever since then.

The player from the UK wanted to try to play in this casino, so he deposited £10 and started playing and he won £500. When he requested a withdrawal, that was when all the problems started. The chat representative informed him that if he wanted to withdraw his winning through the payment method he chose, Quickcash, he needed to make a deposit to that account and he would receive a code which he would use for a withdrawal. After the player followed these steps accordingly, the new problem begun. His withdrawal was sent to security and he needed to wait from 24-48 hours. Jamew18 asked to speak with the manager but the manager just confirmed these steps. The player went to the William Hill Casino personally just so he could prove his identity and that those winning did belong to him. The casino representatives refused to tell the player anything. There is no update ever since.

The player, Alina, made a deposit and won around $20,000. The casino asked her to send in documents for verification. She sent those documents but they asked for an additional document of proof of her income. Since she was a student at that time, she didn't have those documents. The casino advised her to send her parents proof of incomes, so she did. But still, the casino kept asking for her proof of income. In the meantime, she got employed and sent her proof of income to the casino. After that, she was asked to translate the document and get it notary verified. She did so too, sent the documents, but the casino said that her income was not enough for her level of play. Alina became very frustrated and was looking for any kind of help. There is no further update on this case.

The player from Mexico requested a withdrawal of their winning but didn't receive it. The casino claimed that they did send the winning to them already. The player told the casino that they also checked with the bank and they confirmed that no money was received. There is no update on this case.

Natalie, a player from the UK, made a deposit of £875 just so she could receive a bonus. The bonus wasn't given to her and that was why she decided to withdraw her deposits the same way as she deposited them, through E-wallet. The casino told her that they would send her the money via check but she never received the check and the casino claimed that they sent the check twice (why twice?). When Natalie asked the casino to void the check and send her the money via E-wallet, they blocked her account with these reasons: abuse of bonuses and other promotions, and/or cheating, and/or taking unfair advantage, and/or opening any duplicate accounts, and/or undertaking fraudulent practice or criminal activity. Natalie claimed that she never had broken any of these rules and asked for the help on how to continue with this case.

The player played and won with bonuses and a real money multiple times. He did so with this play too, where he won almost £30,000. He was able to withdraw £5,000 without any complications. When he tried to make a withdrawal again, his account was already closed. Then he started receiving emails from different casinos that belong under the same group that he won't be receiving any more bonuses from them. The player became confused because one of these casinos was still paying him his winning. When the player contacted ThePogg, they explained to him that it meant that he had multiple opened accounts with these casinos which also meant that he was taking advantage of multiple bonuses. This case remained open due to no proof was provided by the casino.

After the player opened an account, they deposited €1,000, started playing and won. When they tried to log in to the account, it was closed. The casino informed the player that after their security check and their previous transactions, they decided to close the account permanently. The player didn't know which previous transactions could've caused them this response, but they asked for the refund on the deposit. There is no further information on this case.

The player used her partner's card to make a deposit of £600 and won £2,000. Her winning and deposit were confiscated and the account was closed. When she contacted the chat, they informed her that the details on the card didn't match the details of the account. The casino also found out that the same card was used in a different account which was closed due to self-exclusion. According to the casino's terms and conditions, the deposit should have been automatically denied. Instead of that, the money was accepted. The casino declined to pay the player her winning due to mismatched details on the card with the ones on the account. This complaint remains unresolved.

The player made a deposit and played games for few hours after which his account was closed and he was asked to verify his age. Cootster, the player, sent the documents for his age verification to the casino, but they received the information that he had an account with Barclays bank and there had been some fraud done at this account. He claimed that he didn't own a Barclays bank account and had one at Lloyds TSB. The casino never responded to this complaint and it became impossible to resolve it.

The player made a deposit of an unknown amount and won around €1,200. When the player requested a withdrawal, they were asked to send the documents for verification. The player sent those in but was informed that the documents failed the verification. After that devastating information, the player sent over thirty photos of different kind of documents from every point of view and angle. The case remains unresolved.

The player made a deposit of £,1,000 and won over £10,000. At the casino's sister site, the player won another £10,000. Shortly after that, the William Hill Casino contacted the player and informed them that they had investigated the activity on the account and decided to confiscate the winnings and close the account. When the player asked of what was the reason, the casino sent them a list of their terms and conditions. The player didn't understand and started to look for any kind of help to gain their money back.

After the registration, the player accepted a free bonus and won €1,630. When they requested a withdrawal, their winnings were confiscated, the deposit was returned to their Neteller account and their account was closed. The player requested an explanation from the casino but they only told him that he had broken the bonus terms and conditions, but they never specified which one was it. The player wasn't satisfied with their response but the casino made it clear that their answer was final. This case remains open and unresolved.

The player, MUZZA1991, won around £5,515 while using the reload offers. The casino asked the player for documents for verification. They sent those in and shortly after that found out that the account was permanently closed and the casino's decision was final. The player was confused and, unfortunately, disappointed. There had been no update ever since.

The player won $3,000 while he played the slots games. He wanted to make a withdrawal but the customer support representative informed him that he couldn't because he had 1 cent poker bonus ticket left. Later on, they told him that since he didn't win from the poker bonus tickets, he could request a withdrawal. He was asked to log out and log right back in into his account. After he did so, there happened to be a different representative that told him that he couldn't make a withdrawal until he met the wagering requirements. He decided to do so and lost almost everything but the $68 and the poker bonus ticket was taken away from him too. The player became furious and also used a foul language which he was warned by ThePogg representative to not to use, otherwise, they would've deleted the complaint. The casino tried to wipe away all of their mistakes but ThePogg decided to found the complaint for the player.

The player tried to receive a first deposit bonus after he already made his first deposit. He contacted the helpline and they informed him that he couldn't use it because their funds were no longer available and the promotion would've started when he received the email. The player claimed the ha was not aware of that promotion being available to him at that time. This case is still unresolved.

The player, Vigilante from Canada, had an issue with receiving the two payments requested. The player did receive the withdrawal of CAD1,000 and the CAD2,500 was sent back to their account. After that, the player had no problem of playing and withdrawing the money but said that the case was still not resolved and they were still afraid to deposit more money and play. This case is very confusing but still, we believe that the player had no further issues with the William Hill Casino's further withdrawals.

The player, Joszef, invited his friend to the casino and was supposed to receive the "invite friend" bonus. The casino refused to award him the bonus due to not being eligible to the promotion as decided by the management. Joszef received such a bonus in the past with no issue and that is why he didn't understand why he couldn't receive one this time. There is no update about this complaint.

Emma, a player from the UK, played a slots game but she didn't receive the winning due to a technical issue. She became very frustrated and kept repeatedly contacting the casino, but never received a satisfying answer. The casino responded to this complaint but never resolved it.

The player played a game of roulette and experienced a technical problem. When the player informed the casino about that, they asked them for proof. They deposited more money, just to give the casino a proof, and took screenshots of the issue and sent it to the casino. The casino responded that there was no problem with that game, so the player deposited more money, won, but lost again due to the same problem. The player also mentioned that they had a problem to sign in to the account and didn't know how to play all their games either. The case remains unresolved.

Claire asked the casino for self-exclusion and the casino agreed. Even after that, she was actually able to deposit £130 which was returned to her shortly after. The casino never responded to the complaint.